|
KMID : 0869120120140030221
|
|
기초간호자연과학회지
2012 Volume.14 No. 3 p.221 ~ p.230
|
|
|
Quality Assessment Tools and Reporting Standards in Nursing Research
|
|
Kim Kyung-Hee
Kim Joo-Hyun
Lim Kyung-Choon
Lee Kyung-Sook
Jeong Jae-Sim
Choe Myoung-Ae
Chae Young-Ran
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: Quality of nursing research should be evaluated before it is applied as an evidence for evidence-based nursing practice. This study attempted to analyze and to compare tools for the quality assessment and reporting standards of nursing research using CONSORT and STROBE checklist by types of research design.
Methods: We searched the tools for quality assessment in nursing research based on the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) publication. Then, we analysed and compared the tools for quality evaluation by types of research design.
Results: According to the analysis using CONSORT checklist, ROB shows coherence in 17 items, Jadad shows coherence in 3 items, SIGN (for RCT) shows coherence in 26 items, and Downs & Black shows coherence in 24 items. According to the analysis using STROBE checklist, MINORS shows coherence in 25 items, NOS shows coherence in 21 items, SIGN (for Cohort studies & Case-control studies) shows coherence in 29 items, and RoBANS shows coherence in 21 items.
Conclusion: Based on our analysis, we recommend that nursing researchers should report according to the reporting standards of tools for quality evaluation. We hope that our analysis can be helpful to develop evidence-based nursing.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Quality assessment, Reporting guideline, Nursing research, Evidence-based nursing
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
 
|
|